top of page

ISS PREVIOUS YEAR 2016 PAPER-2 SOLUTION SET-A Q.NO. 11

ISS PREVIOUS YEAR 2016 PAPER-2 SOLUTION SET-A

In the Gauss-Markov linear model, letŷ denote the vector of fitted values andê denote the vector of residuals.

Consider the following statements:





The components of ŷ are pairwise uncorrelated.



The components of ê are pairwise uncorrelated.
ISS PREVIOUS YEAR 2016 PAPER-2 SOLUTION SET-A

One-Way ANOVA Problem (Training Methods Comparison)

Question 11

A company used three different methods to train its employees. The number of units of output produced by employees trained under the three methods are:

Method A: 50, 45, 55, 44Method B: 64, 48, 52, 56, 44Method C: 46, 42, 48, 45, 57, 42

Test whether the three training methods are equally satisfactory at 5% level of significance.

Given: F(2, 12) at 0.05 = 3.89

Also, identify correct hypotheses:

  1. H0: μA = μB = μC

  2. H0: μA ≠ μB ≠ μC

  3. H1: μA, μB, μC are not all equal

  4. H1: μA = μB = μC

Solution

This is a One-Way ANOVA problem.


Step 1: Sample Sizes

n1 = 4 (Method A)n2 = 5 (Method B)n3 = 6 (Method C)

Total observations:

N = 4 + 5 + 6 = 15

Number of groups:

k = 3

Step 2: Hypotheses

Null hypothesis:

H0: μA = μB = μC

Alternative hypothesis:

H1: Means are not all equal

Correct statements: 1 and 3

Correct answer: (a) 1 and 3

Step 3: Compute Means

Method A

TA = 50 + 45 + 55 + 44 = 194Mean A = 194 / 4 = 48.5

Method B

TB = 64 + 48 + 52 + 56 + 44 = 264Mean B = 264 / 5 = 52.8

Method C

TC = 46 + 42 + 48 + 45 + 57 + 42 = 280Mean C = 280 / 6 = 46.67

Grand Total and Mean

T = 194 + 264 + 280 = 738

Grand Mean:

X̄ = 738 / 15 = 49.2

Step 4: Correction Factor

C.F. = T² / NC.F. = 738² / 15C.F. = 544644 / 15 = 36309.6

Step 5: Total Sum of Squares

First compute ΣX²:

Method A:50² + 45² + 55² + 44² = 9486

Method B:64² + 48² + 52² + 56² + 44² = 14176

Method C:46² + 42² + 48² + 45² + 57² + 42² = 13222

Total:

ΣX² = 9486 + 14176 + 13222 = 36884

Now,

SST = ΣX² − C.F.SST = 36884 − 36309.6 = 574.4

Step 6: Sum of Squares Between Groups

SSB = (TA²/n1 + TB²/n2 + TC²/n3) − C.F.

= (194²/4 + 264²/5 + 280²/6) − 36309.6

= (9409 + 13939.2 + 13066.67) − 36309.6

= 36414.87 − 36309.6 = 105.27

Step 7: Sum of Squares Within Groups

SSE = SST − SSBSSE = 574.4 − 105.27 = 469.13

Step 8: Degrees of Freedom

Between groups:

dfB = k − 1 = 3 − 1 = 2

Within groups:

dfE = N − k = 15 − 3 = 12

Total:

dfT = 14

Step 9: Mean Squares

Mean square between:

MSB = SSB / 2 = 105.27 / 2 = 52.64

Mean square within:

MSE = SSE / 12 = 469.13 / 12 = 39.09

Step 10: F Statistic

F = MSB / MSEF = 52.64 / 39.09 ≈ 1.35

ANOVA Summary

Between groups: SS = 105.27, df = 2, MS = 52.64

Within groups: SS = 469.13, df = 12, MS = 39.09

Total: SS = 574.40, df = 14

F = 1.35

Step 11: Decision Rule

Critical value:

F(2,12) = 3.89

Since:

1.35 < 3.89


Fail to reject H0

Final Conclusion

There is no significant difference between the three training methods.

Hence, all three methods are equally satisfactory.

Final Answers

Correct hypotheses: (a) 1 and 3

Conclusion:The three training methods are statistically equally effective at 5% level


ISS PREVIOUS YEAR 2016 PAPER-2 SOLUTION SET-A



Comments


  • call
  • gmail-02
  • Blogger
  • SUNRISE CLASSES TELEGRAM LINK
  • Whatsapp
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
bottom of page